Dan Burisch: 'They Messed Up Our Timeline'

There are impacts [music] into our timeline now which have occurred. This is information that I received from the material within majestic. There are impacts into our reality now. Our timeline now by virtue of the amount of time travel which has occurred. Every time they have gone back in time, they have caused small paradoxes which have built up as our reality that we now perceive. There are human beings that many years ahead of us on another timeline coexisting in reality. We were not supposed to communicate privately with them or anything like that. That we had a certain job to do and we were to get it done and that was the scientific job of removing the the samples. >> In the first video, I showed you a disturbing image of Dan Burish after he went public. At the time, it was something I found on Reddit. Nothing confirmed. But now I found something and that made me take this very seriously. >> I spent 20 years. >> 20 years. These people don't know Jack. I never presuppose to tell them what they're supposed to believe. But they come to me whining. Oh, tell me the truth. Tell me the truth. And I tell them and THEY SAY, "OH, NO. WHEN IS THE LAST TIME THEY'VE BEEN BEAT INTO THE FLOOR? WHEN IS THE LAST TIME SOMEBODY has ever, you know, pushed their crushed their hand under a foot? WHAT DO THEY KNOW? I'M THE ONE THAT WAS SHOVED inside of that clean sphere. I'm the one that had to face what I had to face. They didn't. >> It takes a lot of courage to say things like this publicly. And as you can see, he paid a price for it. If this were fabricated, it's unlikely anything would have happened at all. But man, those images right after he went public, that really makes you think. And it changes how you listen to what he says next. What the P45s meaning they are from the future 45,000 years ahead of >> 45,000 years ahead on a separate timeline than what we are presently on but a timeline that we could transition over to from where we are now. >> I'll be honest, this topic shook me more than I expected. Lately, I've been hearing this idea of multiple timelines more and more. And in this video, Dan goes further than that, which is even more surprising. Honestly, I think he reveals too much. Making such information public comes with a lot of risk. He even goes into who's involved in Majestic, and I wasn't expecting that. Before I play the next clip, let me share something with you. We're already in 2026. Time really flies. AI especially has moved insanely fast over the last few years. It's easy to fall behind. So, I want to tell you about Outskll, the first ever AI focused educational platform to accelerate AI learning for people like you and me. They're hosting a 2-day AI mastermind training live this Saturday and Sunday, 10:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. EST on both days. And right now is the perfect moment to join because you can get in absolutely free as part of their New Year upskilling fest. This 16 hours AI training has already built 10 million plus AI first professionals worldwide and is rated 4.9 out of five on Trustpilot. People from marketing, finance, operations, product and engineering join this just because this is something which is not specific to any industry but is now needed across every one of them. This is where you learn how to build AI agents that plan, write, execute and report for you. Automate workflows that run even while you sleep. Connect tools like Sheets, Notion, CRM, and email to create profitable systems. Use AI to save hours every week and get an unfair advantage at work. Not just that, you'll also learn how to profit from these skills. People from this very training have launched AI powered services that bring in 2 to $3,000 weekly just by applying the systems they're taught. To kickstart your year, you also get premium lifetime bonuses like the AI prompt bible, the AI profit road map, and your personalized AI toolkit builder. Only if you attend both days. And here's the most interesting part. When you sign up, you get access to the 2026 AI survival hackbook, a comprehensive compilation of the upcoming AI shifts in 2026 and the practical steps you can take to be prepared. Seats are limited. Use the link in the description to join. Also join the WhatsApp community to stay updated before the big blast. Big thanks to Outskill for supporting the channel. >> So Majestic is ruled by a secret society is what you're saying. >> Well, Majestic has been the most famous next to probably the Freemasons. Secret society of itself. And there are many of the Freemasons who inhabit the Majestic. These associated secret societies like the Scottish right and New York right are then imparted into the secret society known as the Majestic. >> Majestic or Majestic 12 is supposed to have been a secret group inside the US government [music] created after World War II to deal with things that didn't fit into normal military or scientific channels. He says their job, at least on paper, was to handle information that was considered too sensitive, too strange, or too destabilizing to be public. Now, if you search for Majestic online, most of what you'll find says that it's fake, that it's not real, and there's nothing credible behind it. But let's be honest for a moment. If something like this really existed, do you think you'd be able to find clear answers on a simple Google search? Groups like that wouldn't leave a clean trail behind them. They wouldn't be documented in public, and people who speak about them wouldn't be treated kindly. They'd be questioned, discredited, or attacked. That's just how things like this tend to work. Dan says Majestic was funded through government structures, but it did not function like a normal government agency. It did not report in the usual way. It did not fall under clear political authority. One critical point he says he was present at was the T9 conference. This was a closed meeting in New Mexico where formal negotiations took place between multiple groups from different timelines. The groups present were described as future human groups. Not one single group, but several with different origins and different development paths. One of these groups was referred to as the P45, described as being 45,000 years ahead of us. >> What is the T9 conference? During the course of speaking with extraterrestrials and our our interactions with them from the 1950s onward there have been a series of treaties established between we and they uh they meaning the future human intelligence time travelers >> alien kind by >> well they're they're humans they're they're human >> consider them humans >> they're humans >> okay >> the human beings albeit different from what we would expect to see as a human being but then If we look in the history the the presently accepted history of the evolution of humankind if one were to walk into a conference held by Neanderthalss one would be taken aback well in the same way one may be taken aback by walking into [clears throat] a conference with these gentlemen. >> The purpose of the T9 conference was to establish and adjust agreements between present-day institutions [music] and several future human groups that according to him were able to interact with our timeline. These groups were presented as future branches of humanity. Different outcomes of the same species shaped by very different conditions over very long periods of time. Dan describes three main groups. One of them is the P45. This group is described as coming from a timeline roughly 45,000 years ahead of ours. They are presented as technologically advanced but still relatively biologically stable. Another is referred to as the P-52. They were about 52,000 years ahead of us, shaped by harsher long-term conditions, including environmental and biological degradation. Within the P-52 line, Dan describes two subgroups. One of them is often referred to as the Jrods. They're described as biologically fragile, physically weak, and highly dependent on technology to survive. Their genetic structure has degraded over time, making them increasingly reliant on artificial systems. The other P-52 subgroup is referred to as the Orions. Sometimes also called the Nordics or the Talls. They are described as taller, more physically robust, and more biologically stable than the JRods, having developed along a different survival path. So, these future groups were facing long-term biological collapse in their own timelines and seeking ways to stabilize or reverse that process. That is where something called the Lotus principle comes in. Lotus is described as a biological or energetic process connected to development, neurological function, and long-term genetic stability. It is presented as something rare, difficult to access, [music] and extremely important for the future groups. Dan describes lotus as a biological system, something that interacts with life at a very fundamental level. And this is where his own role as the biologist becomes relevant. At Majestic, [music] they were researching Project Lotus as a biological and environmental process. [music] It started from measurements taken in areas rich in siliconbased minerals where unusual electromagnetic patterns could be detected. These patterns were not random noise. They showed structure, repetition, and internal coherence. More importantly, they [music] interacted with living cells. In controlled laboratory conditions, exposure to these signals caused measurable biological effects. Cells changed their behavior. In some cases, damaged or inactive cells resumed activity in altered forms. This suggests that lotus was not a device or a piece of technology, but a natural process embedded in the environment capable of influencing biological systems at a fundamental level. Over time, this raised a more serious question. If such a process could affect cell function, then it could also affect long-term genetic stability, [music] development, and degeneration across generations. That is why lotus became important. The future groups wanted access to lotus because it could help stabilize their genetic decline. In exchange, they offered information. Information about future events, about long-term outcomes, about what happens if certain paths are followed. That is what makes this story uncomfortable. We were not supposed to communicate privately with them or anything like that. That we had a certain job to do and we were to get it done and that was the scientific job of removing the samples and then the studying of the samples for for the back engineering. These are the reversing like chemicals. The idea was to reverse uh his an illness that that he and his people have the 52 >> the 52s and and what we were trying to do initially jumping off onto the biology a little bit. What we were trying to do is we were trying to actually strip the exterior cytoplasm off from the cells and produce cells which would be independently functioning. then to understand those cells biochemically, genetically so that those cells could then be readded as a graft into the JROD to attempt to ameliorate the the neuropathy. >> The idea of multiple timelines doesn't start with Dan. It already exists in physics. In the 1950s, Hugh Everett proposed what's known as the many worlds interpretation. the idea that reality doesn't collapse into one single outcome but branches into multiple possible outcomes. Later, physicists like David Deutsch expanded on this idea and treated parallel timelines as a serious theoretical model. In this view, reality isn't a single line moving forward. It's a branching structure of coexisting possibilities. This idea also appears outside physics. Over the years, different people connected to classified programs, intelligence agencies, or advanced research have spoken about timelines, parallel versions of events, and branching outcomes. Some call them timelines, others call them parallel worlds. Others describe them as alternative versions of the same reality. >> Basically, you're saying there's two timelines. I mean, I'm sure you're aware of the work of physicists now that are saying, "Look, if you can have two timelines, you can have 2 million." Well, don't we really have three or four? I'm discussing 24,000s. I'm discussing 45,000s, 52,000s, and present day. How many timelines are that? Because these people moved ahead linearly in their timeline. Just because we want to call it timeline two, doesn't mean that there are other effects or super uh imposings which are occurring on different realities during even their own timelines. >> Exactly. I mean there's a sense at which what you're talking about is not so much that the P45s for example timeline won't exist as it will actually separate from our reality and become more like a parallel reality instead of an intersecting one. >> From what I understand the people who were just prior which would be us according to their history to the people who were just after exist as a straight vector of time. Later physicists like Bryce Dit, Sha Carol and Max Tegmark developed and discussed this idea further with modern physics. They approached it from different angles. Quantum mechanics, cosmology, and the mathematical structure of reality, but the underlying idea remained similar. The reality may not be a single linear path. And they're not alone. Over the years, many other researchers, philosophers, and theorists have explored similar models using different language, different frameworks, and different assumptions. The idea also connects to how time itself is described in physics. Albert Einstein's theory of relativity treats time as part of a four-dimensional structure called spacetime, where past, present, and future exist within the same geometric framework. And this is what makes people uncomfortable, because there's one show that keeps getting the future right. The Simpsons. So right and so early that many have started asking if they don't just predict it but access it. Here are concrete examples. Donald Trump as US president showed up in the show in 2000. He entered office in 2016. Wrist video calls appeared in 1995. Apple Watch video calls became normal by 2015. Face-to-face mobile video appeared in 1995. FaceTime launched in 2010. Autocorrect jokes appeared in 1994. Smartphones adopted it widely after 2007. Touchscreen phones appeared in 1995. The iPhone arrived in 2007. Self-driving cars were shown in 2010. Real road tests became public by 2020. Delivery robots appeared in 2014. Cities began using them in 2021. Virtual reality appeared in 1997. Consumer VR took off around 2016. Digital money jokes appeared in 1997. Bitcoin went live in 2009. Disney buying Fox appeared in 1998. The deal closed in 2019. A tiger attacking Sig Freeden Roy appeared in 1993. The real incident occurred in 2003. Mass surveillance themes appeared in 1998. Snowden's leaks exposed it in 2013. Greek financial collapse jokes aired in 2012. Greece defaulted in 2015. Lab grown meat appeared in 1999. It entered restaurants by 2020. Civilian drones appeared in 2005. They became common after 2013. Mars colonization jokes aired in 1994. SpaceX began serious plans around 2020. Lady Gaga's performance aired in 2012. She did it at the Super Bowl in 2017. The Higs Bzon appeared in 1998. CERN confirmed it in 2012. Voting machine disputes aired in 2008. They dominated headlines in 2020. Facial recognition jokes aired in 2003. It spread in public spaces by 2018. AI generated art appeared in 2004. It went mainstream in 2022. Voice assistants appeared in 1998. Alexa launched in 2014. Smart glasses appeared in 2002. Google Glass appeared in 2013. Now getting back at Dan Beerish's story, he mentions something called Project Looking Glass. It's described as a system designed to observe possible future outcomes, not by predicting one fixed future, but by modeling a range of potential timelines based on current conditions and decisions. The idea is that reality does not move toward a single result, but into a branching set of possibilities, and this system was built to explore that structure. Looking glass is described as combining advanced computation with physical modeling to simulate how events might unfold over time. Different variables produce different outcomes, allowing multiple possible futures to be compared side by side. Over time, this creates something like a map of trajectories showing which paths stabilize, which diverge, and which tend to collapse. You've got the looking glass technology that they use and you use and you were instrumental in discovering. >> Were you in >> No, no, no, no, no, no. These this this is an original technology which was derived from ancient cylinder seals by people from our future who provided it to us meaning the roads of P45s. >> Okay. The people from this lovely That's right. We wouldn't have this lovely technology if it wasn't planted in our past for us to use now. >> Dan mentions that looking glass was originally based on a set of very old instructions for accessing naturally occurring wormholes in what he calls hyperspace. Those instructions weren't treated as mythology, but as technical guidance. The equipment was built by following those instructions first, and only later was it modified and refined through experimentation. Over time, this led to the discovery that the system could be used as a kind of peering glass, a way to observe different aspects of both the future and the past. He links those original instructions to ancient cylinder seals, which he says slightly predate the Samrian period and were later recopied into Samrian seals as well. I would say that they slightly predate Sumerian time frame, but that some of the information which came down from cylinder seals that slightly predated the Sumerian time frame were then recopied in Samrian seals as well. And those those cylinder seals Oh yes. And those cylinder seals to the best of my knowledge have all been obtained >> from Iraq. >> Some of them from Iraq. Yes. Some of them from >> some of them from other some of them from Egypt, some of them from other countries where they were being stored. >> This interview was recorded in 2006 with a strong focus on what [music] was expected around 2012. The concern was an approaching energetic event, a large-scale interaction between Earth and the Sun and what was described as a galactic energy flow passing through the planet. This event alone was expected to put stress on Earth's systems. But the real concern was what would happen if that energy interacted with active technology, especially technology designed to [music] observe, model, or interact with spaceime. In the interview, a probability is mentioned, a 19% chance with 85% confidence that a geohysical disaster could occur. That still meant an 81% chance that it would not. But the risk wasn't treated lightly because the scale of the potential outcome was extreme. The disaster described was a global geophysical shift affecting the Earth's crust and causing massive loss of life. The concern was that the active systems could trigger or amplify that process that they could turn a possibility into a certainty. That's why the decision was to disable the technology completely, separate its components [music] and remove it from use. The goal was to let that period pass without technological interference affecting spaceime. Well, such topics make me question reality. These whistleblowers, the Mandela effect, the the Simpsons, and the fact that more and more scientists are talking about multiple timelines and nonlinear time. I know it's hard to even imagine something like that. Again, I'm not here to tell you what to believe. I'm just here to show you the information. It's your responsibility to look deeper, do your own research, and decide what makes sense to you. Thank you for staying until the end. Let me know what you think in the comments. Until next time.