What the term names
The Sanskrit dhāraṇā is formed on the verbal root dhṛ — to hold, to bear, to support — the same root that produces dharma under a different inflection. The technical sense is precise: the deliberate holding of attention on a single chosen object until the field of awareness has narrowed to that object and what surrounds it has stopped pulling. Patañjali defines the limb in a single aphorism (Yoga Sūtras III.1): deśa-bandhaś-cittasya dhāraṇā — dhāraṇā is the binding of the mind to a place. The place (deśa) can be a point in the body, a syllable, a visualised image, the breath at the nostrils — what the chosen object is matters less than the fact that attention now rests on it without being shaken loose. Dhāraṇā is the sixth of the eight limbs and the first of the three Patañjali groups together as saṃyama — the inner work proper — alongside dhyāna (sustained absorption in the chosen point) and samādhi (the collapse of the structural gap between meditator and object).
The continuum, not three techniques
The classical reading treats dhāraṇā, dhyāna and samādhi as a single continuum rather than three separate practices, distinguished by the duration and depth of the unbroken attention. Dhāraṇā is the act of returning to the object each time attention slips; dhyāna is the state in which the return is no longer needed because attention has stopped slipping; samādhi is the dissolution of the meditator-object structure that the two previous limbs presupposed. The transitions are not sequenced by behaviour but by the deepening of a single capacity, which is why Patañjali names the three together as saṃyama and treats them as the operative unit on which the Sūtras' chapter on the powers (vibhūti) is built — the supernormal capacities the text catalogues are described as side-effects of saṃyama applied to particular objects rather than as separately learnable techniques. The same architecture is what links dhāraṇā to the parallel Buddhist limb of samādhi-training: śamatha — calm abiding — uses an object-focused method (most often the breath, in the ānāpānasati form) that is structurally indistinguishable from dhāraṇā, even where the doctrinal scaffolding around it differs. The five limbs the Sūtras lay out before dhāraṇā — yama, niyama, āsana, prāṇāyāma and pratyāhāra — are the conditioning the limb requires; without it the attempt to bind the mind to a place reliably produces forced concentration that fragments back into ordinary distractedness as soon as the effort relaxes.
Where to encounter it in the index
Sadhguru's *Inner Engineering: A Yogi's Guide to Joy* is the index's clearest contemporary articulation of the dhāraṇā limb in its older sense: the Shambhavi Mahamudra practice the book and the Online programme deliver places attention on a chosen point inside a structured sequence of āsana and prāṇāyāma preparation, with the binding of the mind made operative once the pratyāhāra hinge has been crossed. Sadhguru's longer-form lectures, the talk on disability and spiritual practice and the talk on unlocking the mind's full potential repeatedly land on the same point — that the apparent gymnastics of postural yoga is a warm-up for the directed-attention work the eight-limb path treats as the actual practice, and that dhāraṇā is the limb at which the warm-up becomes the work. Paramahansa Yogananda's *Autobiography of a Yogi* carries the kriyā lineage's version of the same training: the kriya-yoga instruction the book transmits is a dhāraṇā technique conducted on the breath and on points along the spinal axis. Jon Kabat-Zinn's MBSR programme carries the secular descendant — the eight-week curriculum's repeated return to the breath at the nostrils is dhāraṇā under a clinical name, and the structure of the practice (the gentle, non-violent return each time attention slips) is the classical Sūtras instruction transposed into language stripped of its Sanskrit scaffolding. Adyashanti's *True Meditation* and *Do Nothing* approach the same territory from the opposite end: what Adyashanti names true meditation is the recognition that the dhāraṇā-and-dhyāna continuum is not the only configuration attention can take, and that the do-nothing limb of self-enquiry is what becomes possible when the directed-attention apparatus is deliberately set down. The two registers are complementary rather than rival: dhāraṇā is the sustained directed-attention work, and the contemplative recognition the direct-path lineage points at depends on the capacity dhāraṇā trains even where it later asks the practitioner to lay it down.
What it isn't
Dhāraṇā is not concentration in the harsh-effort sense most often encountered in contemporary productivity literature. The classical instruction is unambiguous on the point: the binding of the mind is held gently, and the gentleness is structural rather than aesthetic — forcing the chosen object generates a vṛtti (mental modification) under the heading of effort that is itself the obstacle the Sūtras' opening definition (yogaś cittavṛtti-nirodhaḥ) names as the thing yoga is about. The limb is also not meditation in the broad colloquial sense in which the term covers any practice undertaken on a cushion. Patañjali's vocabulary is technical: meditation in the Yoga Sūtras' usage is dhyāna, the state that follows when dhāraṇā has stabilised, and the contemporary collapsing of every contemplative practice into the same English noun has cost the architecture much of its precision. Nor is dhāraṇā an end in itself. The classical reading treats the limb as the door into dhyāna and samādhi, and the texts that have made the Yoga Sūtras' eight-limb path widely available in English are clear that practising the sixth limb without the seventh and eighth produces a refined attention faculty without the recognition the path was laid out to serve.
— end of entry —