What the word holds
The Sanskrit verbal root dhṛ- means to hold, to bear, to support. From it the noun dharma covers everything that holds a thing in its proper form — a stone's dharma is to be heavy, a fire's dharma is to burn, a person's dharma is the conduct that keeps them aligned with what they are and where they are placed. The word predates Buddhism by centuries; it is one of the central terms of the Vedic and post-Vedic vocabulary. Its semantic spread is what makes it slippery to render. Law, duty, teaching, truth, order, reality, phenomenon — all are partial. The same word can pivot inside one verse from cosmic principle to personal obligation to the tiniest unit of experience. The traditions that use it generally let context disambiguate rather than choosing one English gloss and holding to it.
The Hindu sense
In Hindu thought the dominant inflection is dharma as right conduct calibrated to one's varṇa (social position) and āśrama (stage of life). The student's dharma is to learn; the householder's is to maintain a family and contribute to society; the renunciate's is to seek liberation; each is right in its place and would be wrong in another. The Bhagavad Gītā is the most important meditation on this idea. Arjuna refuses to fight on what he reads as dharmic grounds — these are his kinsmen — and Krishna replies that Arjuna's specific dharma (svadharma) as a member of the warrior class on the field of a just war is precisely to fight, and that to refuse would itself be the violation. The doctrine is not absolute relativism. There is also a sanātana dharma — the eternal dharma, the underlying lawfulness of things — and svadharma is supposed to align with it.
The Buddhist sense
Buddhism took the word and used it for two things. The first is the Buddha's teaching: Buddha, Dharma, Saṅgha — the triple refuge — names the awakened one, the teaching he gave, and the community that carries it. In this use dharma is what is being transmitted from teacher to student. The second is a technical term in Abhidharma analysis for the smallest units of experience — the basic mental and physical events that arise and pass moment by moment. In this use a dharma is something like a phenomenon. The two senses are not coincidence: the teaching is a teaching about how phenomena arise. To know the dharma in the second sense is what the dharma in the first sense is trying to enable. The lower-case plural dharmas (as in all dharmas are empty) is the technical use; the singular Dharma with the capital is the teaching.
Where to encounter it in the index
Most of the Buddhist material in the index is dharma talk — the loose oral teaching genre that is the tradition's primary delivery vehicle. Tara Brach and Jack Kornfield's *Power of Awareness* is a Theravāda-flavoured course in the format. Pema Chödrön's *When Things Fall Apart* and her course on awakening compassion are Tibetan Mahāyāna-Vajrayāna dharma in the same form. Thich Nhat Hanh on emptiness, signlessness and aimlessness and Br. Troi Duc Niem from Plum Village are the Vietnamese Zen-Mahāyāna voice. Jon Kabat-Zinn's MBSR is the secularised inheritor — the Buddha's framing of suffering, attention, and direct observation translated into a clinical idiom that names neither the source tradition nor the word dharma. On the Hindu side, the Bhagavad Gītā entry is the single best access point to the question of svadharma.
What it isn't
Dharma is not religion in the Western sense. It is not separable from how one acts in everyday life, and it is not opposed to the secular. It is also not a fixed code: what is dharmic for one person at one time can be adharmic for another, which is why the Indian tradition has always preferred case-by-case casuistry to general rule. And it is not a moralism. The Buddhist analytic use, in particular, is descriptive rather than prescriptive — a list of phenomena that happen, not an injunction about what should. Reading the word as if it meant the law in a Mosaic or Sharia-like sense is the most common Western misreading.
— end of entry —