What's claimed
The teaching is more thoroughgoing than the obvious one about mortality. Anicca applies at every scale: bodies and weather and empires, but also each thought, each sensation, each mood, each moment of attention. Looked at closely, no state of mind survives the looking. The classical Buddhist analysis breaks experience into momentary arisings (dhammas) and observes that the felt continuity of self and world is reconstructed each instant from data that has already passed.
Why it matters in practice
The teaching is clinical, not aesthetic. When impermanence is seen in Vipassanā practice — rather than merely thought about — the tendency to grip pleasant experience and push away unpleasant experience begins to loosen on its own. The argument is that dukkha (suffering) is produced by the gripping, not by the changing, and so when the gripping subsides the suffering does too. The recognition is treated as something to be lived into, not concluded.
Where it appears in the index
Tara Brach, Pema Chödrön, and Thich Nhat Hanh all return to anicca repeatedly under different names. Ram Dass's late teaching, recorded as he was visibly aging, is a particularly clear English-language witness to the doctrine being lived rather than recited.
— end of entry —