The intersection his work names
Harris is one of a small number of contemporary public figures who works both sides of a boundary the twentieth century treated as nearly uncrossable: the academic-philosophical critique of religion and the first-person practice of meditation. He holds a B.A. in philosophy from Stanford (1986–2009, interrupted by an eleven-year retreat-and-study period during which much of the contemplative material in his later writing was acquired) and a Ph.D. in cognitive neuroscience from UCLA, where his dissertation work involved neuroimaging of belief, disbelief, and uncertainty. His public profile rests on three parallel projects: the New Atheism polemics of the mid-2000s (The End of Faith, 2004; Letter to a Christian Nation, 2006), the Making Sense podcast (launched 2013), and the Waking Up meditation app and book (2014–). The relationship between the three projects is the question his readers most often arrive at first, and is the question his work is, on his own framing, organised to refuse to separate.
The practice lineage
Harris is unusual in the secular meditation space for the depth of the contemplative training he draws on. The early phase, during the years he was away from Stanford, was spent in Theravāda vipassanā retreats in India and the United States — including the ten-day S.N. Goenka courses and longer sittings at the Insight Meditation Society under Joseph Goldstein and Sharon Salzberg. The middle phase added the Tibetan Dzogchen instruction of Tulku Urgyen Rinpoche and his sons Mingyur Rinpoche and Tsoknyi Rinpoche; the pointing-out teachings of that lineage are the structural source of the headless attention exercises in the Waking Up curriculum. The third stream is the Advaita Vedānta direct path — Harris has named the lineage that runs from Ramana Maharshi through Nisargadatta Maharaj to Rupert Spira as a primary contemporary reference. The synthesis the Waking Up curriculum offers is the non-dual recognition reached through vipassanā-style attention training — a sequencing that follows the lineage of his teachers rather than the doctrinal claims of any one school.
Where to encounter him in the index
*Waking Up: A Guide to Spirituality Without Religion* is the 2014 book in which Harris first set out the position that consciousness-as-such is the only datum sufficient to ground a serious spirituality once the supernatural claims of the traditional religions are dropped — and the structural argument the Waking Up app curriculum has been elaborating since. Waking Up: Introductory Course is the standalone version of the app's first month of practice instruction, the cleanest single entry point for a reader who wants the practice without the framing. Sam Harris on Vipassana, Non-duality, and the Self is the long-form interview in which the lineage and the synthesis are explained in his own voice; Sam Harris on Cutting Through to Consciousness Without a Center is the same material at podcast length, with the no-centre claim — the anattā recognition in Theravāda vocabulary — at the front. Sam Harris: Why Smart People Turn to Christianity is the recent talk in which he addresses, more sympathetically than the early polemics did, why intellectually serious people return to the religious traditions he had critiqued — and what the contemplative core of those traditions retains independent of the supernatural claims. The early-career polemical books (The End of Faith, Letter to a Christian Nation, The Moral Landscape) are not in the index; the contemplative material is.
What his work isn't
Harris's contemplative project is not Buddhist, and he is explicit about not taking on the doctrinal architecture of the tradition that gave him most of his practice training — no rebirth, no cosmology, no refuge. The Waking Up curriculum is also not, in his framing, a secular version of religion that is finally about the same thing: Harris is sceptical of the perennialism the Aldous Huxley line of thought represents, and treats the question of whether the various traditions point at one recognition as empirically open rather than as settled by their convergent vocabulary. And his contemplative work is not separable from his political and cultural commentary in the way some of his contemplative readers wish it were: the same epistemic conscientiousness that drives the Making Sense podcast's political content drives his meditation instruction, and the contemplative and the polemical projects are, on his account, the same project applied to two different domains.
— end of entry —