The Gītā's formulation
Chapter two, verse forty-seven of the Bhagavad Gītā — karmaṇyevādhikāraste mā phaleṣu kadācana — is the most-cited Sanskrit verse on the practice in the Indian record: you have a right to action alone, never to its fruits; do not let the fruits of action be your motive, nor let your attachment be to inaction. The instruction is not to act without effort, nor to act without preference for one outcome over another. It is to act fully — with skill, with attention, with full alignment to *dharma* — and then to relinquish the egoic claim on the outcome at the moment the act is released. Krishna spends most of the Gītā unfolding what that relinquishment actually means in practice, and the medieval commentarial tradition — Śaṅkara, Rāmānuja, Madhva — fills out the rest.
Why it isn't passivity
The most common misreading treats niṣkāma karma as a recipe for detachment-as-disengagement — don't care about the result, then nothing can disappoint you. The classical commentators are unanimous that this is the wrong reading. The point is not to remove the felt stakes of action but to remove the I that claims them. Action proceeds with full intelligence and full energy; the practitioner's sense of being the doer who must possess the result is what is released. The practice is closer to a continuous return — like the breath in meditation — than to a permanent attainment. Arjuna's situation in the Gītā is the strongest case the tradition could have chosen: a warrior on a battlefield where the right action is killing his cousins. Krishna's instruction is not don't fight; it is fight without the egoic claim on the outcome.
How it sits beside the other yogas
Niṣkāma karma is the operative discipline of karma yoga — the path of selfless action, one of the four classical yogas alongside *bhakti*, *jñāna* and *rāja*. The Gītā's argument is that every path requires the practice to some degree: the bhakta must release the claim on the beloved's response, the jñānī must release the claim on the insight, the rāja yogī must release the claim on the meditative state. The vocabulary differs by tradition — the Sufi names it surrender (islām); the Christian contemplative names it thy will be done; the Daoist names it *wu wei*; Patañjali names it *īśvara-praṇidhāna* — but the operative move is the same.
In the index
Sadhguru's Inner Engineering: A Yogi's Guide to Joy treats niṣkāma karma as one of the practical instructions of the Īśā Yoga curriculum — Krishna's verse is quoted in the chapters on action without identification with the actor. The most-watched English-language living transmission of the practice, though, is Ram Dass, whose entire later teaching on service — the Seva Foundation work, the karma yoga framing of caring for the dying — is niṣkāma karma in an American voice. The Maharaji story about *only God* is the same practice compressed into a single exchange: the seeker arriving with a transactional demand and being met by a teacher whose attention is not for sale on those terms. The teacher's freedom from the transaction is not indifference; it is the freedom the practice points at.
What it isn't
Niṣkāma karma is not the same as low ambition, low effort or low intensity of engagement. It is not — as some Western readers have taken it — Stoic resignation in Sanskrit dress, though there are real convergences with the Stoic discipline of prosoche. And it is not a guarantee that outcomes will go the practitioner's way once the inner posture is correct; the karma entry catalogues the related misreadings of cosmic reciprocity. What the practice changes is the practitioner — their relationship to the result, their freedom to act fully without being held hostage by what comes after. What it changes about the world is a function of the action it makes available, not a metaphysical bonus on top.
— end of entry —