What it isn't
Surrender is not giving up. It is not the resignation of someone who has been beaten. It is not refusing to act. The tradition is unanimous that those misreadings are precisely what make the practice unattainable for many seekers. Surrender names the cessation of a particular kind of internal contraction — the part of the will that insists outcomes must be a specific way — while leaving every ordinary human action available.
Michael Singer's articulation
Michael Singer has written the cleanest English-language exposition of the practice as such — The Surrender Experiment (2015) is the autobiography of someone who took the practice seriously for forty-plus years and watched what happened. The instruction is small and durable: when life presents what it presents, do not contract against it; let it through, and let it inform action rather than be obstructed by reaction. The result, on his report, is not paralysis but unprecedented effectiveness.
Across traditions
Islām names submission to God; fanā' in Sufism names the dissolution of the self in the divine. Thy will be done is the prayer Yeshua gave; the dark night material in John of the Cross is a description of the same practice under intense conditions. The Christian abandonment to divine providence (Jean-Pierre de Caussade) is the same instruction in eighteenth-century French. Bhakti devotion in India treats surrender as the easiest path because the heart already knows how to do it when the right object is in view.
— end of entry —