The method
The instruction is short and almost defiant in its plainness. Choose a sacred word — any short word the practitioner is willing to take as the sign of their intention to consent to God's presence and action within. Sit silently for twenty minutes, eyes closed, in a comfortable upright posture. When the attention wanders — into thought, image, sensation, plan, memory — return gently to the sacred word and let the rest go. Two sittings a day is the standard prescription; one a day is the minimum the method's proponents will agree to call regular practice. There is no concentration target, no visualisation, no specified breath count, no mantra repetition, no contents to attend to at all. The sacred word is not a focus; it is a marker the practitioner agrees with themselves they will return to whenever they notice they have left, and the noticing-and-returning is the entire training. Thomas Keating's *Open Mind, Open Heart* is the standard handbook; the Centering Prayer Course is the same teaching in instructional form.
The Spencer origin
The method was developed at St Joseph's Abbey in Spencer, Massachusetts, by three Cistercian monks across the second half of the 1970s. William Meninger began the work in 1975 by teaching from The Cloud of Unknowing — the anonymous fourteenth-century English contemplative manual — in retreats at the abbey guesthouse. Basil Pennington adapted the teaching for retreat use and gave the resulting method its first popular exposition in Daily We Touch Him (1977) and Centering Prayer (1980). Thomas Keating, who had been elected abbot in 1961 and stepped down in 1981 to give the work its institutional vehicle in Contemplative Outreach, became the central public figure of the method and gave it the theological frame on which it now rests. The three monks were responding to a specific complaint of the years following the Second Vatican Council: young Catholics interested in contemplation were leaving to study Zen in Japan and Vipassanā in Burma because the equivalent practice was no longer being taught at home. Centering Prayer was the deliberate reintroduction, from within the Christian apophatic inheritance, of what those traditions had retained.
The theological frame
The doctrine that underwrites the method is the Christian apophatic tradition — the strand running through Pseudo-Dionysius, The Cloud of Unknowing, Meister Eckhart, John of the Cross and the Rhineland mystics — which holds that what God is cannot be reached through concept, image or affective response, and that the soul approaches God most directly when it consents to the silence in which thought is set down. Centering Prayer is that consent operationalised: the sacred word is not an address to God, not a meditation object, not a focus of attention. It is the practitioner's stipulated sign that they are agreeing, again and again, to set aside their own apparatus. Keating was at pains throughout the forty years of his teaching career to insist that the practice does not produce contemplation — contemplation is given by grace — and that what the practitioner can do is consent to its reception. The relationship between effort and grace is the doctrinal hinge.
In the index
The index carries the canonical contemporary texts of the practice and the closest adjacent presentations. Thomas Keating's *Open Mind, Open Heart* (1986) is the foundational handbook and the book most practitioners are pointed to first. The Centering Prayer Course is the same teaching in audio-instructional form, recorded for Sounds True near the end of his life. Thomas Keating's *Insights at the Edge* interview with Tami Simon is the most accessible long-form presentation of the method in his own voice. Thomas Merton's *New Seeds of Contemplation* and *Thoughts in Solitude* are not method manuals — Merton, two decades older than Keating, did not teach a discrete technique — but they are the texts a Centering Prayer practitioner of the second half of the twentieth century was most likely to have been reading alongside, and Keating cited them throughout his career. Richard Rohr's *The Naked Now* and his extended *On Being* conversation with Krista Tippett present the same family of practices from the Franciscan side, with a stronger comparative-religion register. The wider contemplative prayer entry maps the field; Centering Prayer is one practice within it, paired with the parallel lectio divina of the older Benedictine tradition and the hesychasm of the Christian East.
What it isn't
Centering Prayer is not the same as secular meditation, although the mechanics are identical: the theological frame insists that what is being consented to is not a state of consciousness but a relationship with a personal God, and removing the frame changes what the practitioner thinks the practice is doing even if it does not change what their attention is doing. It is not lectio divina, which begins from a scriptural text and ends in silence rather than beginning there. It is not hesychasm — the Christian East's continuous Jesus Prayer tradition is older, more austere and theologically more committed to a specific christology, and Keating was careful to distinguish the lineages. And it is not the dark night of John of the Cross: Centering Prayer is the daily practice that prepares the ground, not the purgative passage that practice may eventually open onto.
— end of entry —