Life and trial
Eckhart von Hochheim — Meister (master) Eckhart in posterity — was a Dominican friar and theologian born around 1260 in Thuringia, central Germany, and almost certainly dead by 1328. He held the chair of theology at the University of Paris twice — the second time, the rare distinction reserved for figures like Thomas Aquinas before him — and rose to senior administrative roles in the Dominican Order. He was also an itinerant preacher, and the German vernacular sermons he delivered to lay audiences and to the Beguine communities of Strasbourg and Cologne are what made him famous in his own century and have made him essential reading in this one.
In 1326 the Archbishop of Cologne, John of Virneburg, opened an inquisitorial process against him for heresy, citing propositions drawn from his sermons and his Latin commentaries. Eckhart appealed to the papal court at Avignon, travelled there in person, and is presumed to have died before judgment was rendered. In 1329 Pope John XXII issued the bull In agro dominico, condemning twenty-eight propositions drawn from his works as heretical or suspect. The condemnation drove the texts underground for centuries; large parts of his Latin and German corpora were rediscovered, edited, and properly attributed only in the twentieth century.
The teaching
At the centre of Eckhart's preaching is a distinction that became the through-line of the Christian apophatic tradition: God and Godhead (Gott and Gottheit). God is the named, knowable divine — the God of creation, providence, liturgy. Gottheit is the unnameable ground from which God himself proceeds — the Godhead beyond God, accessible only by unsaying every predicate that would distinguish anything from anything else. The recognition is apophatic: it proceeds via negativa — not this, not this — until the apparatus of distinction itself falls silent. The Sanskrit equivalent — neti neti — sits inside the non-duality entry; the Buddhist family resemblance is in emptiness.
Eckhart's second great teaching is the Birth of the Word in the Soul: the claim that what scripture describes as the eternal generation of the Son by the Father takes place, structurally, in the ground of every soul, perpetually. The implication — that the deepest part of the human being is not separate from the deepest part of God — is what the Avignon condemnation identified as a problem and what later readers across Christianity, non-duality, and the mysticism of other traditions have identified as the recognition. His third major contribution is Gelassenheit — releasement, letting-be — the disposition by which the soul stops grasping its own attributes, virtues, and identifications, and so makes the inner room in which the Word can be born.
The afterlife of the work
Eckhart's vernacular sermons fed directly into the anonymous fourteenth-century Theologia Germanica, which Luther later edited and praised; into the writings of his Dominican students Johannes Tauler and Henry Suso; and, two centuries later, into the mystical poetry of Angelus Silesius. In the twentieth century Eckhart was rediscovered by an unlikely range of readers. Heidegger took Gelassenheit as a philosophical category. D.T. Suzuki argued that Eckhart's account of the Godhead and his Birth of the Word in the Soul were structurally the same recognition Zen names kenshō. Thomas Merton placed Eckhart at the centre of the Christian-Buddhist dialogue he conducted in the last decade of his life.
The contemplative prayer tradition that Thomas Keating and his collaborators reframed for lay practitioners drew Eckhart's apophatic vocabulary into its working theology. He is the rare medieval theologian who reads as a contemporary — partly because the questions he was asking remain the questions, partly because the vocabulary he developed for not answering them is still the most precise available in the Christian tradition.
Why he is in the lexicon
The index does not yet hold an item dedicated to Eckhart's writings, which is why this entry's links array is empty — a precedent set by the Sufism and other entries where the lexicon documents what the index has not yet ingested. Eckhart earns his place here through cross-link weight: every entry in this corpus that touches Christian apophatic theology, the recognition of emptiness, or the meeting of non-duality with the Western tradition reaches for him by name. The Godhead beyond God is the working English-language phrase for what the Sanskrit calls neti neti, what the Daoist calls wu, what the Buddhist calls śūnyatā. The recognition is the same; the vocabulary differs. Eckhart's vocabulary is the Christian one, and the most precise the Christian tradition produced before the twentieth century forced these languages back into conversation with one another.
— end of entry —