Life
Born in Murcia in 1165 to an aristocratic Andalusian family, Muḥyī al-Dīn ibn ʿArabī moved with his father to Seville while still a child and received the standard education of his class — Arabic grammar, Qurʾān, ḥadīth, Mālikī jurisprudence. The turning point his autobiographical writings record came not in the seminary but in a vision sometime in his late teens, in which he reported seeing the prophets Jesus, Moses and Muḥammad and was instructed to take the path of taḥqīq — the verification of truth by direct experience rather than by transmission. He travelled across Andalusia and the Maghreb meeting the older Sufi masters of his generation, then made the ḥajj to Mecca in 1202, settled in Damascus from 1223, and died there in 1240. He left behind, by the count of his Ottoman editor ʿAbd al-Wahhāb al-Shaʿrānī, more than three hundred works in Arabic; the most read are al-Futūḥāt al-Makkiyya — The Meccan Openings — a 560-chapter compendium of Sufi doctrine, and Fuṣūṣ al-Ḥikam — The Bezels of Wisdom — a shorter and denser text presenting twenty-seven chapters keyed to twenty-seven prophets.
The doctrine of waḥdat al-wujūd
The phrase waḥdat al-wujūd — the unity of being — is not Ibn ʿArabī's own coinage; it was supplied a generation later by his commentator and step-son Ṣadr al-Dīn al-Qūnawī, and the school that descends from him. The doctrine itself is in the texts. Wujūd — being, existing, the active participle of the Arabic verb to find — applies properly only to God. Created things do not have being; they are loci through which divine being is disclosed in finite forms. The world is therefore not separate from God (which would be polytheism) and not identical with God (which would be confusion of registers); it is the manifestation (ẓuhūr) of God to God in the modes of finite things. The human being is the most complete locus of this self-disclosure, and the heart of the realised gnostic — the ʿārif — is capacious enough for God, the saying Ibn ʿArabī cites repeatedly from the ḥadīth qudsī: neither my heaven nor my earth contains me, but the heart of my believing servant contains me.
The structural similarity to Advaita Vedānta — only the absolute is real, the world is real as the absolute's appearance, the realised one knows this not as a belief but as an immediate perception — has been noted by every comparativist from Toshihiko Izutsu in the 1960s onward. Ibn ʿArabī's vocabulary remains scrupulously Islamic; his doctrine is unmistakably resonant with non-dual Vedāntic thought. The two traditions developed in mutual ignorance of each other across the same medieval century, which makes the convergence the more striking. The same recognition shows up at almost the same date in the German Rhineland in Meister Eckhart, and in the apophatic theology of the Eastern Christian tradition before either.
Influence
Ibn ʿArabī's afterlife is enormous and largely Persian. His commentator al-Qūnawī taught the next generation; through al-Qūnawī the doctrine reached the great Persian Sufi lineages, and through them the Ottoman intellectual world. Rumi was probably never a direct student — al-Qūnawī, however, was Rumi's friend in Konya and conducted his funeral prayer in 1273. Persian poetry from Maḥmūd Shabistarī through Jāmī works inside the waḥdat al-wujūd frame. Indian Naqshbandī Sufism imported the doctrine to the Mughal court. In the modern Arab world Ibn ʿArabī remains both revered and contested — orthodox Sunnī jurists from Ibn Taymiyya in the fourteenth century to contemporary Salafī polemicists have charged him with pantheism; his defenders have argued, plausibly, that the charge mistakes the grammar of the doctrine.
Why he isn't yet in the index
The Sufi material the index currently carries reaches Ibn ʿArabī through later figures and through secondary literature on Sufism; no primary text or recorded lecture in his name has been added in his own right. The entry exists chiefly to mark the absence. The case for adding primary material is strong: Toshihiko Izutsu's Sufism and Taoism (1966) remains the most-cited comparative entry point, William Chittick's The Sufi Path of Knowledge (1989) is the standard scholarly introduction in English, and the Beshara translations of selected Futūḥāt chapters have been in print since the 1970s. The poetry of al-Tarjumān al-Ashwāq — The Interpreter of Desires — is the most accessible single doorway and has been translated more than once. The omission is editorial rather than principled; Ibn ʿArabī belongs in any contemplative-life index, including this one, and the gap is named here in advance of its closing.
— end of entry —